| |
House to Vote on Iran War Powers 03/05 06:10
The House is preparing to vote Thursday on a war powers resolution to halt
President Donald Trump's attack on Iran, a sign of unease in Congress over the
rapidly widening conflict that is reordering U.S. priorities at home and abroad.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House is preparing to vote Thursday on a war powers
resolution to halt President Donald Trump's attack on Iran, a sign of unease in
Congress over the rapidly widening conflict that is reordering U.S. priorities
at home and abroad.
It's the second vote in as many days, after the Senate defeated a similar
measure along party lines. Lawmakers are confronting the sudden reality of
representing the American people in wartime and all that entails -- with lives
lost, dollars spent and alliances tested by a president's unilateral decision
to go to war with Iran.
The tally in the House is expected to be tight, but the outcome will provide
an early snapshot of the political support, or opposition, to the U.S.-Israel
military operation and Trump's rationale for bypassing Congress, which alone
has the power to declare war.
"Donald Trump is not a king, and if he believes the war with Iran is in our
national interest, then he must come to Congress and make the case," said Rep.
Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Meeks said in his nearly three decades in Congress, the hardest votes he has
taken have been deciding whether to send U.S. troops to war.
The roll calls are a clarifying moment for the president and the parties
just days into the overseas conflict that has quickly carried echoes of the
long U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Many veterans of those wars have since
run for office and now serve in Congress.
Republicans largely back Trump, and most Democrats oppose the war
Trump's Republican Party, which narrowly controls the House and Senate,
largely sees the conflict with Iran not as the start of a new war, but the end
of a regime that for decades has long menaced the West. The operation has
killed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which some view as an
opportunity for regime change, though others warn of a chaotic power vacuum.
Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, the GOP chairman of the House Foreign Affairs
Committee, publicly thanked Trump for taking action against Iran, saying the
president is using his own constitutional authority to defend the U.S. against
the "imminent threat" the country posed.
Mast, an Army veteran who worked as a bomb disposal expert in Afghanistan,
said the war powers resolution was effectively asking "that the president do
nothing."
For Democrats, Trump's war with Iran, influenced by Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, is a war of choice that is testing the balance of powers in
the U.S. Constitution.
"The framers weren't fooling around," said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., arguing
that the Constitution is clear that only Congress can decide matters of war.
He said whether lawmakers support or oppose the Trump administration's
military action, they should have the debate. "It's up to us, we've got to vote
on it."
While views in Congress are largely falling along party lines, there are
crossover coalitions. Both the House and Senate resolutions were bipartisan,
and are drawing bipartisan support and opposition. The House is also voting on
a separate resolution affirming that Iran is the largest state sponsor of
terrorism.
The war powers resolution, if signed into law, would immediately halt
Trump's ability to conduct the war unless Congress approved the military
action. The president would likely veto the measure.
As an alternative, a small group of Democrats has proposed a separate war
powers resolution that would allow the president to continue the war for 30
days before he must seek congressional approval. It is not expected to come yet
for a vote.
Trump officials provide shifting rationale for war
After launching a surprise attack against Iran on Saturday, Trump has
scrambled to win support for a conflict that Americans of all political
persuasions were already wary of entering. Trump administration officials spent
hours behind closed doors on Capitol Hill this week trying to reassure
lawmakers that they have the situation under control.
Six U.S. military members were killed over the weekend in a drone strike in
Kuwait, and Trump has said more Americans could die. Thousands of Americans
abroad have scrambled for flights, many lighting up the phone lines at
congressional offices as they sought help trying to flee the Middle East.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the war could extend eight weeks,
twice as long as the president himself first estimated. Trump has left open the
possibility of sending U.S. troops into what, so far, has largely been bombing
campaign by air. Hundreds of people in the region have died.
The administration said the goal is to destroy Iran's ballistic missiles
that it believes are shielding its nuclear program. It has also said Israel was
ready to act against Iran, and American bases would face retaliation if the
U.S. did not strike first. On Wednesday, the U.S. said it torpedoed an Iranian
warship near Sri Lanka.
"This administration can't even give us a straight answer of as to why we
launched this preemptive war," said Rep. Thomas Massie, the Republican from
Kentucky who is often an outlier in his party.
Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who had teamed up to release the
Jeffrey Epstein files, also forced the war powers resolution to the floor,
pushing past objections from House Speaker Mike Johnson.
Johnson has warned that it would be "dangerous" to limit the president's
authority while the U.S. military is already in conflict.
Senators sit in their desks for solemn vote
In the Senate, Republican leaders have successfully, though narrowly,
defeated a series of war powers resolutions pertaining to several other
conflicts during Trump's second term. This one, however, was different.
Underscoring the gravity of the moment Wednesday, Democratic senators filled
the chamber and sat at their desks as the voting got underway.
"Today every senator -- every single one -- will pick a side," Senate
Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said before the vote. "Do you stand with the
American people who are exhausted with forever wars in the Middle East or stand
with Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth as they bumble us headfirst into another
war?"
Sen. John Barrasso, second in Senate Republican leadership, said "Democrats
would rather obstruct Donald Trump than obliterate Iran's national nuclear
program."
The legislation failed on a 47-53 tally mostly along party lines, with
Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky in favor and Democratic Sen. John
Fetterman of Pennsylvania against.
|
|
