05/05/26 01:18:00
Printable Page
05/05 13:16 CDT Chef declines to answer money questions in assault trial of
former Patriots player Diggs
Chef declines to answer money questions in assault trial of former Patriots
player Diggs
By LEAH WILLINGHAM
Associated Press
BOSTON (AP) --- A woman who worked as a live-in personal chef for former New
England Patriots receiver Stefon Diggs declined to answer questions Tuesday
about financial demands made on her behalf, as defense attorneys pressed her
over claims she was owed money and inconsistencies in what she said she was
paid.
Both sides finished calling and cross-examining witnesses just about a day
after the assault trial began, as Jamila "Mila" Adams became emotional on the
stand describing an alleged encounter with Diggs on Dec. 2 in which she said he
entered her room following an argument over text.
Adams, who said she lived in the NFL star's home and prepared all of his meals,
testified that Diggs "smacked me with an open hand" before wrapping his arm
around her neck and choking her, leaving her struggling to breathe. She
described what she called a "complicated" relationship, saying it had
previously been sexual but was not at the time of the alleged assault.
A Dedham police officer who took her initial report testified that Adams was
visibly upset when she arrived at the station, telling jurors she "sat down on
the bench and she was crying."
Diggs has pleaded not guilty to a felony strangulation charge and a misdemeanor
assault and battery charge stemming from a December incident at his home.
Closing arguments are expected to begin later Tuesday.
Money vs. motive
Adams said she met Diggs in 2022 on Instagram and that the two became friends
--- at times "friends with benefits," as one of his attorneys described it ---
before she was later hired to live in his home and prepare his meals during the
football season.
The case has turned in part on whether the dispute between them was primarily
about money or an alleged assault. Defense attorneys have argued Adams was
motivated by a financial dispute, pointing to demands for payment and a planned
trip to Miami, while Adams has maintained she was reporting an assault.
Defense attorneys pressed Adams about money she said she was owed after working
as a live-in chef. She testified she was paid about $2,000 a week and believed
she had not been fully compensated after being sent home. They pointed to a
$19,000 demand and said the amount increased over time, with her attorney later
seeking $5.5 million.
When asked about the $5.5 million claim, Adams said, "I can't speak on that,"
and at other points told jurors, "I don't understand the question" and "I don't
know how to answer the question."
At one point, Adams said Diggs had offered her $100,000 to recant her statement
to the police, but that remark was struck from the record after the judge
called the attorneys to a sidebar.
At times during her second day on the stand, Adams was instructed by the judge
to answer questions directly and not include additional details beyond what was
asked. Portions of her responses were struck from the record as nonresponsive,
with jurors told to disregard them.
"This is not an opportunity for you to interject your own narrative and evade
answering questions," Judge Jeanmarie Carroll told her at one point, warning
that continued nonresponsive answers could result in her testimony being
stricken.
Witnesses describe accuser's appearance after alleged attack
Kenneth Ellis, the Dedham police officer who took Adams' initial report,
testified that she arrived at the station visibly upset, telling jurors she
"sat down on the bench and she was crying." He said Adams initially asked to
speak with a female officer before later agreeing to give a statement and
identifying Diggs as the person involved.
Under cross-examination, Ellis said he did not observe visible injuries,
collect photographs or speak with other witnesses, and that his investigation
relied largely on Adams' account and text messages she provided.
Defense attorneys also sought to challenge Adams' account through testimony
from people in Diggs' orbit and evidence they said reflected her demeanor in
the days after the alleged incident.
His chief of staff, massage therapist, a nurse who provided IV treatments and
his hairstylist all testified that they saw her around the time of the attack
and that she said nothing about being assaulted.
His hairstylist, Xia Charles, testified that she spent time with Adams in New
York in the days after the alleged incident and did not notice any injuries.
She said Adams appeared normal and that she did not see marks on her neck or
elsewhere.
Defense attorneys also showed jurors cellphone videos of Adams socializing,
including clips of her in a car listening to music and dancing, which they
suggested showed her demeanor in the days following the incident.
Jeanelle Sales, Diggs' chief of staff, who also goes by "Sunni," testified she
saw Adams at the home on the day she alleged she was assaulted and did not see
visible marks, redness or swelling on her neck or face. She said Adams appeared
to be in normal spirits.
"She was walking around looking for a piece of paper and a pen to write a card
--- I guess, write a note to him for his birthday gift," Sales said.
Prosecutors pushed back on that testimony, suggesting the witnesses'
livelihoods were tied to Diggs and that they had a financial interest in the
outcome of the case.
|